SineSwiper wrote:Replay wrote:I dispute your analysis on account of my persistent inability to achieve underweightness.
You box. You can't possibly be overweight.
BTW, my hypothesis was originally what I was talking about, so it wasn't the opposite.
I take it you're not familiar with the history of boxing.
One of the few people to come close to beating Joe Louis was a fat bartender named Tony Galento, nicknamed "Two Ton" because he claimed to have been late for a match because he had two tons of ice to deliver - also because he liked to weigh in at about 235 lbs (which was a lot heavier comparatively back when food was scarce, during the Depression era) and eat lots of spaghetti, pasta, really anything he wanted, if the stories about him are true.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Galento
<img src="
http://static.boxrec.com/wiki/thumb/f/f ... .Tony4.jpg">
Also, I urge you to consider good ol' Butterbean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Esch
<img src="
http://paxarcana.files.wordpress.com/20 ... erbean.jpg">
Fat boxers are slow, easy to hit, frequently low on stamina - but if they hit you and hit you hard, you are probably going down from the momentum of the blow if nothing else, and it will hurt, a whole lot.
Check out some of Butterbean's KOs on YouTube. His record is not all that impressive taken as a whole by modern boxing standards, but I've seen at least one fight where he gets hit, gets hit, gets hit - then socks the guy in the face with one good right. The guy's head literally snaps back to its maximum extension, snaps BACK down forward all the way to his neck, then snaps back again and he falls like a tree. I don't know that anyone on here would really want to fight Butterbean and his 416 lbs of jelly-roll.
(Also, I don't really "box" - I do a boxing-based workout. It keeps me in okay shape, but actually boxing regularly is far more intense.)