serously.....that fucking blew ass.....it was like Jason Bateman surrounded by poop...it doesn't touch him but it get's al over everything else.....ugh....that fucking blew all kinds of ass
Zeus wrote:I expected a decently tolerable one...instead I got one that didn't know what it wanted to be....the start is retarded comedy, then it does generic superhero for a bit which is then followed up with it trying to be a serious drama. The only decent thing about the movie was that Bateman was fantastic. other thn that it was just bad....will was pretty good he just couldn't save a butchered script.....it was supposed ot be a little over 2 hours if you read the script for it (they cut almost the entirety of the character development which made the flick feel stilted and jumpy.) Instead it clocks in at about an hour twenty of actual screen time....Chris wrote:that was better than the movieWill Smith on July 4th weekend.....did you expect a good movie?
RentCavalier wrote:Seriously? The trailers look fantastic--seems like comedy, but with honest drama and emotion adn all that jazz. Is it really that terrible?yep.sort of an hour and a half superman returns....really nly 4 actions sequences and only one of them is really any good. the character shift seems really badly done and honestly...it's missing about a halfhour of development. it just didn't know what kind of movie it wanted to be
Zeus wrote:Will Smith on July 4th weekend.....did you expect a good movie?Will Smith is a good actor. I don't understand all of the hate. Some of the reviews said that he was the only good part about the movie.
SineSwiper wrote:I never said he was a bad actor, but being a decent/good actor don't mean you got good movie selection.Zeus wrote:Will Smith on July 4th weekend.....did you expect a good movie?Will Smith is a good actor. I don't understand all of the hate. Some of the reviews said that he was the only good part about the movie.
Also, what the fuck?! Dave White is no longer a reviewer?!?
Zeus wrote:the problem is is that you can see great potential in it. it's got an interesting premise that was telegraphed to the point where I knew everything that was going to happen 5 minutes into the film.....it made baby jesus crySineSwiper wrote:I never said he was a bad actor, but being a decent/good actor don't mean you got good movie selection.Zeus wrote:Will Smith on July 4th weekend.....did you expect a good movie?Will Smith is a good actor. I don't understand all of the hate. Some of the reviews said that he was the only good part about the movie.
Also, what the fuck?! Dave White is no longer a reviewer?!?
kali o. wrote:I watched it...and liked it just fine. Don't get me wrong, I get why people would be let down - just like Office Space, Hancock felt the need to add a "plot" midway through when the original (and more interesting) premise would have been enough to carry the movie.Pretty much my feelings toward it.
For what it was though, Hancock was an enjoyable film.