Your place for discussion about RPGs, gaming, music, movies, anime, computers, sports, and any other stuff we care to talk about...
Replay wrote:i'm bored...i still smoke.You're in LA right?
this site is evidence for my whole life so i don't mind posting this even though i've officially had my ass kicked by the cops now.
but i'm so grateful. i have a medical card now. i hope nobody hates me.
Tessian wrote:As long as it's treated to the same restrictions and laws as cigarette smoking currently is then I don't care... although with the added ban on driving while high (I don't buy into the anti-drug commercial either, but you can not tell me that it doesn't impair you similar to being drunk).cosign
Legalize it, tax it, everyone wins. There's a way out of this recession yet! Think of all the jobs and tax dollars gained by this new market.
Anarky wrote:yeah mangReplay wrote:i'm bored...i still smoke.You're in LA right?
this site is evidence for my whole life so i don't mind posting this even though i've officially had my ass kicked by the cops now.
but i'm so grateful. i have a medical card now. i hope nobody hates me.
Tessian wrote:As long as it's treated to the same restrictions and laws as cigarette smoking currently is then I don't care... although with the added ban on driving while high (I don't buy into the anti-drug commercial either, but you can not tell me that it doesn't impair you similar to being drunk).True, but I'd rather have a pothead on the highway than a drunk. Driving 20MPH on a freeway is still dangerous, but it's better than swerving on 75MPH.
Legalize it, tax it, everyone wins. There's a way out of this recession yet! Think of all the jobs and tax dollars gained by this new market.
SineSwiper wrote:True, but I'd rather have a pothead on the highway than a drunk. Driving 20MPH on a freeway is still dangerous, but it's better than swerving on 75MPH.Eh...I'd say they are equally dangerous because you have everyone swerving around the idiot going 20. I'd rather have neither on the highway. You want to do it, fine, but do it in private where it's only yourself that is affected.
SineSwiper wrote:That's like saying it's better to have a grandmother in her Cadillac with the handbrake on the left lane rather than retired stock car driver. Most places in the world they've actually recognized that slow idiots cause accidents (including in Scotland and up here in Canada) and are actually more dangerous than the fast ones.Tessian wrote:As long as it's treated to the same restrictions and laws as cigarette smoking currently is then I don't care... although with the added ban on driving while high (I don't buy into the anti-drug commercial either, but you can not tell me that it doesn't impair you similar to being drunk).True, but I'd rather have a pothead on the highway than a drunk. Driving 20MPH on a freeway is still dangerous, but it's better than swerving on 75MPH.
Legalize it, tax it, everyone wins. There's a way out of this recession yet! Think of all the jobs and tax dollars gained by this new market.
kali o. wrote:So you're a Selective Lovable Prick then :-)Replay wrote: it was less foremost in my mind than withstanding kali's verbal attacks. i'm glad he hasn't weighed in yet. if he does and i leave forever you'll know why.I won't take bait unless it's less boring...you gotta work to deserve my attention.
