SineSwiper wrote:Did you see the last thing on that news article: Spielberg is next expected to direct "Tintin."Yeah, he and Jackson are each directing the first two (Spielberg first) and producing all three. No one knows who's directing the third
Legend of The Seeker wrote:I am actually really excited about the Tintin moves, the filming of the first is going to be done before the Hobbit while the second and third will be after. I've always thought these stories needed a higher budget live action treatment, and few I would have faith to do it, luckily Peter Jackson is one.Tintin? The dog?
SineSwiper wrote:Tintin is the kid, the dog is Snowy.Legend of The Seeker wrote:I am actually really excited about the Tintin moves, the filming of the first is going to be done before the Hobbit while the second and third will be after. I've always thought these stories needed a higher budget live action treatment, and few I would have faith to do it, luckily Peter Jackson is one.Tintin? The dog?
Tessian wrote:As Anarky pointed out, you obviously haven't seen the South Park episode about the latest Indiana Jones movie, have you?Yes, I have. And frankly, I can somewhat excuse it, since it was one of those 10 year old projects that ended up being done just to get rid of the idea of another Indiana Jones movie. It would like Duke Nukem Forever coming out and thinking, "Gee, I stopped caring a long time ago, and now that it's out, it's not really that good, either."
Flip wrote:I was actually curious if anyone in the US was familiar with Tintin since it's a European thing (but fairly big in Canada and Latin America as well). For Sine: it is based on a Belgian reporter living in a fictional early 20th century world. There's a fictional totalitarian regime in a nation called Borduria which is somewhat based on the Nazis and ussr; as far as a military dictatorship goes. The story covers episodes of Tintin reporting on the exploits of Borduria (assassinations, supporting regimes around the world, military involvement, etc.) as well as other things like strange Egyptian and middle eastern cults that turn out to be part of an international opium smuggling operation.SineSwiper wrote:Tintin is the kid, the dog is Snowy.Legend of The Seeker wrote:I am actually really excited about the Tintin moves, the filming of the first is going to be done before the Hobbit while the second and third will be after. I've always thought these stories needed a higher budget live action treatment, and few I would have faith to do it, luckily Peter Jackson is one.Tintin? The dog?
EDIT:: You're thinking Rin Tin Tin, the german shepard. Or Benji, lol.
Mully wrote:IMDB shows Speilberg will direct TINTIN (not very Speilbergian of him), but I don't think he will direct Oldboy. Spielberg hasn't done a remake to my knowledge.He did do Jurassic park, though, which was a remake of a book... does that count?
Flip wrote:He did do Jurassic park, though, which was a remake of a book... does that count?
Flip wrote:I dont like, in general, how they are considering remaking a 2003 movie. Its not old yet, why dont they just dub the original and ship it over instead of ruining it?Gawd, that reminds me of Michael Haneke who did Funny Games (1997) in German, then remade it last year in English. FRAME-BY-FRAME remake of HIS OWN MOVIE!!!!
bovine wrote:has anyone seen this movie?Same for me, i got it on Netflix last year sometime and i think the American version would be re-written all to hell for our fragile religious minds.
SPOILERS? (but not really, so I'm not going to white it out)
I saw it sometime last year and... It explores some more mature themes that American cinema doesn't touch.
Legend of The Seeker wrote:Aren't a lot of horror movies we see remakes of fairly recent Asian ones?**SPOILS**
Flip wrote:I dont like, in general, how they are considering remaking a 2003 movie. Its not old yet, why dont they just dub the original and ship it over instead of ruining it?The Departed.
Kupek wrote:Point, taken.Flip wrote:I dont like, in general, how they are considering remaking a 2003 movie. Its not old yet, why dont they just dub the original and ship it over instead of ruining it?The Departed.
Mully wrote:My thoughts exactly. There is no such thing as a "remake of a book". Most good movies, including many that Spielberg did, used a book as source material. (Anybody heard of Minority Report? How about Munich? War of the Worlds? AI? Catch Me If You Can? Schindler's List? Hook? How about Empire of the Sun, or The Color Purple? Any of those books/movies ring a bell?)Flip wrote:He did do Jurassic park, though, which was a remake of a book... does that count? :)
Mully wrote:Gawd, that reminds me of Michael Haneke who did Funny Games (1997) in German, then remade it last year in English. FRAME-BY-FRAME remake of HIS OWN MOVIE!!!!You mean like this movie?
SineSwiper wrote: My thoughts exactly. There is no such thing as a "remake of a book". Most good movies, including many that Spielberg did, used a book as source material. (Anybody heard of Minority Report? How about Munich? War of the Worlds? AI? Catch Me If You Can? Schindler's List? Hook? How about Empire of the Sun, or The Color Purple? Any of those books/movies ring a bell?)Forgot about War of the Worlds. Could be considered a remake since it had already been a movie about tripod alien ships.
Flip wrote:See, it only counts when you actually saw the original movie.Kupek wrote:Point, taken.Flip wrote:I dont like, in general, how they are considering remaking a 2003 movie. Its not old yet, why dont they just dub the original and ship it over instead of ruining it?The Departed.
Legend of The Seeker wrote:The people of this board have a tendency to think that movies that don't aren't made under the exact criteria what they want (ie. Captain America) that they should not be made; and that the world will probably end if they are made.so wait..... you're saying that the world WON'T end if bad movies are made? Whew, there's a load off my shoulders.
bovine wrote:Remember when videogames ended when Wii Fit was released?Legend of The Seeker wrote:The people of this board have a tendency to think that movies that don't aren't made under the exact criteria what they want (ie. Captain America) that they should not be made; and that the world will probably end if they are made.so wait..... you're saying that the world WON'T end if bad movies are made? Whew, there's a load off my shoulders.
SineSwiper wrote:If Stanley Kuprick could make Clockwork Orange, then maybe Spielberg could remake Oldboy. However, the violence needs to be intact to keep the integrity of the movie. I'm already pissed about Let The Right One In being remaked into a less than average movie. This will probably end up the same with it being "not as good as the original".Kuprick also made Clockwork Orange? Was it better than Kubrick's 1971 classic? :-)
Shrinweck wrote:As long as he doesn't mainstream it up I can't see it being too terrible as long as basic events are kept intact. I cannot imagine a single white actor coming near to the desperation involved with Min-sik Choi's acting, though. I think he did such a good job in the original portrayal that any other actor trying to follow him is just going to do a shit job in comparison. Or maybe I'm wrong. Depp's pretty fucking amazing at being insane.Oh, I could think of several white actors that could pull it off. (Why do you have to be racist? Does it have to be a black man?) But, you need the crazy eyes, crazy personality, and the "this guy is going to fuck you up with a hammer" look. But, you also need more than just crazy, but a sense of justifiable anger.
Shrinweck wrote:As long as he doesn't mainstream it up I can't see it being too terrible as long as basic events are kept intact.Have you seen a Speilberg film, ever? Aside from 2 that I can think of (Munich and A.I.), everything he's done has been for mainstream audiences. We're talking about the guy who pioneered product placement for cryin' out loud (Reeses Pieces in E.T.)